Tort Law from the Perspective of Corrective and Distributive Justice
نویسنده
چکیده
In the following paper we will be mapping tort law in the common law, reflecting on the divergence between corrective and distributive justice and their main theoretical defenses deployed by Anglo-American scholars. The concepts are in turn portrayed in their proper context: a legal culture shaped historically different from the continental legal culture. However, at a deeper level, both traditions are motivated by the same goals: how to provide justice for the victims of tort law. Because the road to destination is different, the common law having distinct ways of addressing torts, the continental jurist my need another sets of concepts to understand this domain of law.
منابع مشابه
Distributive Justice in Pharmaceutical Torts: Justice Where Justice Is Due?
Ongoing tort reform efforts attest to the significant burden that medical liability imposes on the health care system. General attempts to curb excesses can narrow socioeconomic disparities, but as Clark Havighurst and Barak Richman observe, such measures may leave intact some of the regressive characteristics of the framework they supplant. Therefore, it seems appropriate to question whether t...
متن کاملDistributive and Corrective Justice in the Tort Law of Accidents
Tort scholarship on the law of negligence has long been torn between two competing conceptions. One of these conceptions—the justice conception—holds that negligence law is (and should be) an articulation of our ordinary moral conceptions of agency and responsibility, carelessness and wrongdoing, harm and reparation. The other conception—the economic conception—holds that the law of negligence ...
متن کاملTheoretical review and Planning process of the Relation between Environment, Spatial Justice and Urban Governance
The concept of spatial justice has been widely employed in the recent literature that attempts to deal with concepts and practices of justice from a geographical perspective. However, the concept of spatial justice needs to be recast. Spatial justice could be the most radical offspring of law’s ‘spatial turn’. Spatial justice is arguably the most promising platform on which to redefine, not o...
متن کاملJackpot Justice: Verdict Variability and the Mass Tort Class Action
Mass tort scholars, practitioners, and judges struggle with determining the most efficient approach to adjudicate sometimes tens of thousands of cases. Favoring class actions, mass tort scholars and judges have assumed that litigating any issue once is best. But while litigating any one issue could conceivably save attorneys’ fees and court resources, a single adjudication of thousands of mass ...
متن کاملمفهوم خطا و نقش آن در ساختار طبقه بندی مسئولیت مدنی
Concept of delict(Tort) in Roman Law on the base of Deontology as a ethical theory is recognized in the concept of breach of first Duty and structure of category in this legal system is formed on the base of Obligation and Responsibility as a secondary of breach of first Obligation.in contrast in Common Law and Jurisprudence, concept of Tort in accordance to ethical theory of teleology is...
متن کامل